Obscenity Research Paper

This sample Obscenity Research Paper is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need help writing your assignment, please use our research paper writing service and buy a paper on any topic at affordable price. Also check our tips on how to write a research paper, see the lists of research paper topics, and browse research paper examples.

Throughout history, people have represented sexuality in literature and  art.  However, pornography, in  the  early twenty-first century use of the term, did not emerge as a mass industry until the late 1950s. It eventually broke into mainstream distribution outlets and had grown to a business estimated at $12 billion a year in the United States by the end of the twentieth century, with increasing acceptance in U.S. culture. While still proscribed by law in a variety of ways and considered unacceptable in many circles, pornography is used more openly, while at the same time pop culture has adopted many of the conventions of pornography.

State and federal laws in the United States uses the term obscenity, rather than pornography, to describe sexual material that can be regulated. Obscenity prosecutions in the United States were infrequent and uncontroversial in the eighteenth century and early nineteenth century. After the  Civil War,  obscenity became a more  public issue, largely due to the work of Anthony Comstock and other conservative religious  crusaders.  Obscenity  became increasingly politicized in the United States in the twentieth century, particularly when literary works such as James Joyce’s Ulysses (1922) were kept out of the country.

In 1957 in Roth v. United States, the Supreme Court first stated clearly that obscenity was outside the protection of the First Amendment, kicking off a string of cases in which the Court wrestled with how to define and regulate obscenity. In the 1973 Miller v. California decision, the Supreme Court established a three-part test for identifying obscenity, defining it as: (1) material that appeals to the prurient interest; (2) material that portrays sexual conduct in a patently offensive way; and (3) material that does not have serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Further  the  Court  identified contemporary community  standards as the measure of evaluation. In decisions since Miller, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of zoning ordinances that restrict adult theaters and the use of racketeering statutes against businesses that sell obscene materials.

A separate category is child pornography, which comprises material that is either made using children or, in the digital age, made  through  the  use of technology that makes it appear that the sexual activity portrayed involves children. The former is illegal (under New York v. Ferber, 1982);  the  status of the  latter  remains uncertain  (see Ashcroft v.  Free  Speech  Coalition [2002],  in  which the Court  ruled that the section of the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 that banned “virtual” child pornography was unconstitutional, calling it too broad in its scope).

Indecency, a term from radio and television broadcasting, defines a broader category that  can be regulated. Indecent material is defined as language or material that, in context, depicts or describes sexual or excretory organs or activities in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary  community  standards for  the  broadcast medium. The Federal Communications Commission administers indecency regulations.

Obscenity laws tend to be enforced in places where there is political support from citizens. This prosecutorial discretion means that material for sale openly in one jurisdiction may not  be available in another. However, the availability of  mail-order  and  computer  pornography means that graphic, sexually explicit material can now be obtained easily anywhere in  the  United  States. As the enforcement of legal prohibitions has lessened, a formerly underground  industry with ties to organized crime has become a routine business with its own trade magazine, Adult Video News.

The term used most often in the public debate over sexually explicit material is pornography. This term is not rooted in law and has no commonly accepted definition. It is sometimes used as a generic term for commercially produced, sexually explicit books, magazines, movies, and Internet sites, with a distinction commonly made between soft-core material (nudity with limited sexual activity that does not  include  penetration)  and  hard-core  material (graphic images of actual, not simulated, sexual activity including penetration). In other contexts the term is juxtaposed to erotica, defined as material that depicts sexual behavior with  mutuality  and  respect. Pornography,  in contrast, is material depicting sex involving domination or  degradation. In  laboratory studies of pornography’s effects, three categories of pornography have been created: overtly violent, nonviolent but  degrading, and sexually explicit but neither violent nor degrading.

Up until the 1970s, debates over pornography pitted liberal advocates of sexual freedom against conservative proponents of traditional sexual morality. That dynamic changed with the feminist critique of pornography, which emerged out of the larger struggle against sexual violence during the second wave of the women’s movement in the 1960s. Feminist critics argued that discussions of the issue should focus not on questions of subjective sexual mores but on the harm to women. Pornography, they claimed, harmed all women, not just those used in pornographic material.

Bibliography:

  1. Dworkin, Andr 1981. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: Perigee.
  2. Lane, Frederick 2000. Obscene Profits: The Entrepreneurs of Pornography in the Cyber Age. New York: Routledge.
  3. MacKinnon, Catharine , and Andrea Dworkin. 1997. In Harm’sWay: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Strossen, N 1995. Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women’s Rights. New York: Scribner.

See also:

Free research papers are not written to satisfy your specific instructions. You can use our professional writing services to buy a custom research paper on any topic and get your high quality paper at affordable price.

ORDER HIGH QUALITY CUSTOM PAPER


Always on-time

Plagiarism-Free

100% Confidentiality
Special offer! Get discount 10% for the first order. Promo code: cd1a428655