The State Research Paper Example

This sample The State Research Paper Example is published for educational and informational purposes only. If you need help writing your assignment, please use our research paper writing service and buy a paper on any topic at affordable price. Also check our tips on how to write a research paper, see the lists of research paper topics, and browse research paper examples.

The ancient Greeks explored the dialectics of the gaze in the form of the myth of Medusa, who can turn people to stone with a single glance. The Medusan story symbolically condenses a range of experiences of looking and being looked at in the graphic image of the “petrifying gaze” (petrification meaning literally the turning of the other into an inert object), and the Medusa, being a female deity, introduces the idea that “looking” implicates sexual and gendered phenomena of some social and cultural importance.

The human sciences have demonstrated that “looking” is a profoundly social and political phenomenon that obliges the analyst to distinguish between different modalities and practices of seeing (“looking,” “gazing,” “staring,” “glancing,” and so forth). It is thus important to distinguish the physical and physiological properties of “seeing” from the culturally defined forms of “looking.” For example, very young infants tend to stare at objects and others (particularly other persons with a distinctive physical attribute); as children are socialized they learn to sublimate this natural inclination into the more civil act of glancing and looking away. Children are taught that certain forms of eye contact are regarded as impolite, that looking is subject to appropriateness norms.

We are not far from Jean-Paul Sartre’s analysis of voyeurism and the attendant social relations of masochism and sadism in his work Being and Nothingness (1956). Here the Medusan imagery is elevated into a description of the human condition as consciousness seeks to objectify the other person and thereby escape from the petrifying glance of another consciousness. Simone de Beauvoir (1908-1986) built upon Sartre’s phenomenology of the gaze by formulating the topic in explicitly gendered terms, distinguishing between the aggressive masculine gaze and the defensive feminine look. Frantz Fanon explored similar phenomena by identifying the racialized perspective that projects the other as the object of racial oppression and prejudice (Fanon 1967).

Today the cultural construction of the gaze has led to a number of significant lines of research. Feminism’s critique of patriarchal modes of experience, including the phallocentric ways in which women’s bodies and female experience are cast into “objective” terms, is frequently formulated in “objective” terms, resulting in representations of women as an “object” of male desire. In a similar vein, John Berger has explored the male gaze and its role in creating representations of the female body in the history of Western art and, more particularly, in the history of the two- and three-dimensional nude figure (Berger 1972). Noteworthy in the field of media and film studies is Laura Mulvey’s psychoanalytically inspired work on the voyeuristic conventions of Hollywood cinema, and more especially her theory of the phallocentric links between male visual pleasure and narrative cinema (1989). Erving Goffman’s investigations of the “interactional work” of seeing and being seen—for example, the blank “stare-into-the distance” assumed by urban passengers (the kind of neutral stare adopted in situations such as sharing an elevator, traveling on the subway, standing in line, etc.)— led him to his concept of “civil indifference.” Goffman’s research (1963, 1970) was prefigured by the German sociologist Georg Simmel (1858-1918), who is well known for pioneering work in the social phenomenology of the blase attitude of cosmopolitan life. For Simmel, the urban metropolis creates forms of life where the self lives in a world of strangers, is continuously observed by the disinterested eyes of crowds, and loses the potential of creativity envisionment.

The look and its social analysis continues to play an important role within the field of visual culture theory and research. Popular culture is increasingly defined as a culture of global visuality, where all signifiers are either explicitly or implicitly reconfigured in voyeuristic terms— a multimedia world-industry of images designed to be looked at. Today computer-based communications, TV, film, and digitized multimedia provide the ultimate technological means that extend the social relationships embodied in gazing to a planetary stage. The related concepts of “the society of the spectacle,” “simulacral culture,” and the surveillance society have been developed to explore new geographies of power as these are redefined by the electronic media of watching, staring, and controlling the social field.


  1. Eisenstadt, S. N. 1963. The Political Systems of Empires. London and New York: Free Press.
  2. Engels, Friedrich. 1972. The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State. New York: International Publishers.
  3. Fairbank, John K. and Denis Twitchett, eds. 1978-2003. The Cambridge History of China. 12 vols. Cambridge, U.K., and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Farb, Peter. 1968. Man’s Rise to Civilization as Shown by the Indians of North America from Primeval Times to the Coming of the Industrial State. New York: Dutton.
  5. Fried, Morton H. 1967. The Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology. New York: Random House.
  6. Haas, Jonathan. 1982. The Evolution of the Prehistoric State. New York: Columbia University Press.
  7. Llewellen, Ted C. 1983. Political Anthropology: An Introduction. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.
  8. Nelson, Brian R. 2006. The Making of the Modern State: A Theoretical Evolution. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Ohmae, Kenichi. 1990. The End of the National State. New York: Free Press.
  10. Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press, and Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  11. Service, Elman R. 1975. Origins of the State and Civilization: The Process of Cultural Evolution. New York: Norton.
  12. Shaw, Martin. 2000. Theory of the Global State: Globality as Unfinished Revolution. Cambridge, U.K., and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Smith, Vincent A. 1981. The Oxford History of India. 4th ed. Delhi and New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Strayer, Joseph R. 1970. On the Medieval Origins of the Modern State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  15. Thapar, Romila. 2002. Early India: From the Origins to AD 1300. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  16. Tilly, Charles, ed. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  17. Van Creveld, Martin. 1999. The Rise and Decline of the State. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society, eds. Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich, trans. Ephraim Fischoff et al. 2 vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  19. Wittfogel, Karl. 1957. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

See also:

Free research papers are not written to satisfy your specific instructions. You can use our professional writing services to buy a custom research paper on any topic and get your high quality paper at affordable price.


Always on-time


100% Confidentiality
Special offer! Get discount 10% for the first order. Promo code: cd1a428655